Bull Breeds !!!

Should They Be Banned ?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shitzu`s Own

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
R

r.A.n.D.o.M

Guest
So im talking about dogs here

APBT - American Pitbull Terrier
SBT - Stafforshire Bull Terrier ( my uncle has one )
ASBT - American Staffordshire Bull Terrier

wags2006001-1.jpg


^ APBT ( pure breed )

staffordshire_bull_terrier_03.jpg


^ SBT ( purebreed )

sligo_mod.jpg


^ASBT ( APBT crossed with SBT )


my point is do you think that these dogs should be banned altogether because theyre breed <u>WAS</u> bred for bull and dog fighting or do you think they should punish the deed and not the breed when a dog attacks ....
 
R

r.A.n.D.o.M

Guest
Pics would be nice of your dog not you captain mysterious
 

GrayFox

New member
Feb 2, 2006
4,044
0
0
Zenny
22
Points
0
Definitely no. Those dogs can just as easily be trained to be kind as they can be trained to be dangerous. It's the people who train them to be dangerous who are to blame for the terrible stories in the media.
 
R

r.A.n.D.o.M

Guest
thats what i try to tell my dad but hes a gullible dick
 

Infamous

New member
Jul 30, 2006
815
0
0
Zenny
0
Points
0
<div class='quotetop'>(Zayne.H;17370)</div><div class='quotemain'>No, like Ray said, its the damn people who train their dogs to be killers or aggressive, not their damn DNA or what they were from.</div>

yeah... no.



killer bees. that is all.
 

Infamous

New member
Jul 30, 2006
815
0
0
Zenny
0
Points
0
<div class='quotetop'>(GrayFox;17404)</div><div class='quotemain'>Dogs aren't insects.</div>



meaning dogs don't have DNA? o_O
 

GrayFox

New member
Feb 2, 2006
4,044
0
0
Zenny
22
Points
0
I'm just saying that dogs aren't insects and that they have thought processes that bees don't have.
 

Infamous

New member
Jul 30, 2006
815
0
0
Zenny
0
Points
0
so you're saying because they're smarter that it can't be built into their DNA to be aggressive?
 

GrayFox

New member
Feb 2, 2006
4,044
0
0
Zenny
22
Points
0
I'm saying the DNA makes them very obedient rather than very aggressive. If you teach them to be mean, they'll be the meanest dogs ever. If you teach them to be nice, they can be the some of the nicest dogs ever.
...Whereas bees live much more by instinct than any canines.
 

Infamous

New member
Jul 30, 2006
815
0
0
Zenny
0
Points
0
<div class='quotetop'>(GrayFox;17544)</div><div class='quotemain'>I'm saying the DNA makes them very obedient rather than very aggressive. If you teach them to be mean, they'll be the meanest dogs ever. If you teach them to be nice, they can be the some of the nicest dogs ever.
...Whereas bees live much more by instinct than any canines.</div>

if what random said is right, these dogs were bred to be aggressive(to fight and maim other dogs). not bred to be obedient. maybe trained to be obedient, otherwise how could they control they're killer dogs, right?

i'm just waiting for you to say the right words so i can set up a debate. (if it's not up already, my memory's shite right now for some reason.)
 

GrayFox

New member
Feb 2, 2006
4,044
0
0
Zenny
22
Points
0
It seems to be a combination of breeding and training, though training is the most important.
But what I'm saying is just because a dog is a pitbull doesn't mean it's satan incarnate. A pitbull could supposedly be bred to be an aggressive dog, but how the dog is raised is an extremely important factor. The same DNA/thoughts/whatever that could potentially make a pitbull aggressive could make the dog a kind, loyal pet instead. So this just leads me to believe that it's more about the trainer and/or owner than how the dog is bred.