Ready for a ridiculously lengthy post? I know I am, because this thread is bland and I'm sick in bed with little else to soak on.
A semantics question. Widely interpretable and variously intended. A more suitable wording for its usual intent would be, "Are you theistic?" so I'll answer that.
I embrace uncertainty in every aspect of my awareness. A Christian-like response system was interwoven into me to bear on every question of consequence in my life at a very young age, but I eventually separated from those ideals at 14 or so, knowing that there was no rationale behind holding another esoteric entity responsible for my course of action, or future (especially after grasping few of the various ways in which people assume indirect empowerment, when such inspiration is clearly of their own mustard).
Proponents of major theistic beliefs receive initiative from what they cannot explain, and that is a very dangerous risk to me. I'm in inclined to think this my only life, lavishly regarding it an incredible opportunity, rather than the starting piece of a continuum. Aside from that, the more confidence that exists in the truth of something, the less reason the mind has to examine it. In other words, assuming allows the mind to stop evaluating, and assurance is adversely proportional to estimation.
This is a truth that only the majority of atheists and agnostics accept with open arms, but my criticisms for the average atheists are as fierce as those for neighboring Christians, Jews, and practitioners of other popular belief-systems. Most of these theistic systems, by the way, rely heavily on supernatural plotting - thus if not for all of the contradictions - a faithfulness in one should be deemed equitably sound with shouldering all of them.
Sergeant Dreamer said:
Unfortunately, I do not. I'm a Buddist and were not aloud to celebrate anything having to do with the guy upstairs.
If you feel wrong, you're not a Buddhist.